Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
NW DC-10 Back At SFO This Morning  
User currently offlineRoots From United States, joined Feb 2004, 98 posts, RR: 0
Posted (4 years 5 days 9 hours ago) and read 2337 times:

Saw NW DC-10 in new livery at SFO intl terminal A this morning. Anyone knows if it's a substitution for the inbound flight or are they going to use DC-10 to NRT today? What's the reason for the substitution? TIA.

19 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineBoeing757/767 From United States, joined Jun 1999, 2201 posts, RR: 1
Reply 1, posted (4 years 5 days 9 hours ago) and read 2289 times:

It looks like it was operating the NRT flight today:

http://www.nwa.com/cgi-bin/flifo2.pro?flight=%20%2027&day=08OCT&lang=


Free-thinking, left-leaning secularist
User currently offlineBoeing757/767 From United States, joined Jun 1999, 2201 posts, RR: 1
Reply 2, posted (4 years 5 days 9 hours ago) and read 2280 times:

Also, meant to add probably because one of the new A330-200s needs new brakes after an emergency landing with engine issues this week.


Free-thinking, left-leaning secularist
User currently offlineLeamside From United States, joined Apr 2000, 371 posts, RR: 1
Reply 3, posted (4 years 5 days 8 hours ago) and read 2193 times:

I think Boeing757/767 is right. And I thought we had seen the last of the DC-10s.

The good ole '10 has saved the day by being a back up. Otherwise, there's no real good reason to use it when considering the 330 uses about 30% less fuel than the tri-holer.

Saw the plane take off and disappear into the fog at 1:50PM. New colors too. What a surprise!

User currently offlineNwacrew From United States, joined Apr 2003, 311 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (4 years 5 days 8 hours ago) and read 2158 times:

I guarantee the cabin crew for flight 27 was mighty sorry to see the three-holer at the gate!

User currently offlineThrust From United States, joined Sep 2003, 2424 posts, RR: 17
Reply 5, posted (4 years 5 days 6 hours ago) and read 2072 times:

We will never see another passenger DC-10 flying transpacifically after NW's DC-10s are gone. Is there a legitimate reason why trijets are losing to the quadra-jets?


Fly one thing; Fly it well
User currently offlineKtachiya From Japan, joined Sep 2004, 1495 posts, RR: 1
Reply 6, posted (4 years 5 days 6 hours ago) and read 2064 times:

Thrust

This is more for economical reasons. As mentioned before in this thread, it is more fuel efficient and with gasoline prices going up right now, they need it. Another factor that contributed to this was the E-TOPS which enables twin engine jets like the 767 and the 777 to fly over the Pacific.

So when the winter schedule starts, AC is going to fly a 767 to NRT from YVR and YYZ. Also YVR-KIX is doubly daily in a 767 and the NGO route (stopped 10/31) is also a 767


Flown on: DC-10-30, B747-200B, B747-300, B747-300SR, B747-400, B747-400D, B767-300, B777-200, B777-200ER, B777-300
User currently offlineFavre From United States, joined Apr 2000, 576 posts, RR: 10
Reply 7, posted (4 years 5 days 6 hours ago) and read 2035 times:

it was due to A330-200 #3354 getting an engine change in nrt...........

User currently offlineMoneyShot From United States, joined Jun 2004, 93 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (4 years 5 days 6 hours ago) and read 2002 times:

Maybe Im a bit late on this but since we are on the subject, what happened with the 330 at NRT?

User currently offlineFlyMeToTheMoon From United States, joined Jul 2004, 222 posts, RR: 1
Reply 9, posted (4 years 4 days 10 hours ago) and read 962 times:

The 332 landed at NRT last week with engine problems (thrust reversers not working I believe) and the brakes on the main left carriage caught on fire during landing. Japanese TV even had a video with the fire brigade out and about spraying the carriage. Not too unusual. Interestingly enough the 332 taxied to the gate on its own power after the brakes cooled off. Must have been quite the show being on-board.


Fly me to the moon... but not through LHR!
User currently offlineTrvlr From United States, joined Feb 2000, 4417 posts, RR: 20
Reply 10, posted (4 years 4 days 10 hours ago) and read 887 times:

Perhaps something to do with Typhoon Ma-On? Just a guess.

Aaron G.

User currently offlineAs739x From United States, joined Apr 2003, 4295 posts, RR: 20
Reply 11, posted (4 years 4 days 3 hours ago) and read 684 times:

Aaron...huh? What would an engine problem have anything to due with a Typoon?

ASSFO


"Some pilots avoid storm cells and some play connect the dots!"
User currently offlineB4real From United States, joined Aug 2003, 2431 posts, RR: 6
Reply 12, posted (4 years 4 days 3 hours ago) and read 678 times:

Here is a link to the thread about the grouond fire on a brand-new NW A330 at NRT.

http://www.airliners.net/discussions/general_aviation/read.main/1765038/

B4REAL


B4REAL, spelled like it sounds
User currently offlineRedtailmsp From United States, joined Feb 2004, 202 posts, RR: 3
Reply 13, posted (4 years 2 days 13 hours ago) and read 555 times:

The A330 schedule should be back to normal as of tomorrow when 3354 should be back in service on flt 6 NRT-PDX. The long delay in getting it back in service was caused by NWA having to get an engine from DTW...it had to be trucked to ORD and then be put on a freighter that ran ORD-ANC-NRT. As regards the incident, it was the nbr 1 engine that wa shut down. It landed 70000lbs overweight due no fuel dump system ordered by NWA, so yes, some brake repairs required too.

User currently offlineGigneil From United States, joined Nov 2002, 13447 posts, RR: 81
Reply 14, posted (4 years 2 days 13 hours ago) and read 531 times:

Is there a legitimate reason why trijets are losing to the quadra-jets?

Trijets require significant structural fortification to carry that engine on the tail. Relative to a quad, its substantially more weight and the engine is hard to service.

The 332 landed at NRT last week with engine problems (thrust reversers not working I believe) and the brakes on the main left carriage caught on fire during landing.

There were engine problems and a heavy landing, but not fire. The brakes smoked, and got hosed off and released steam. There was no flame.

The long delay in getting it back in service was caused by NWA having to get an engine from DTW...

Given the popularity of the 100" PW4000 amongst some Asian operators, you'd think they'd have set up a way to get an engine on more quickly.

N

User currently offlineNwfltattendant From United States, joined Nov 2003, 341 posts, RR: 4
Reply 15, posted (4 years 2 days 12 hours ago) and read 475 times:

The last thing im concerned about is the crew that took the DC-10 to NRT. Id do anything to get off of furlough and fly a TPAC DC-10. Maybe unemployment would be a better option for these 'pillow-pawed' FAs that cant deal with the DC-10... or sit at home on TA (time awailable for non-FA people) and wait for a call !!!


Go yakkin !!!!!!
User currently offlineAa777jr From , joined today!, posts, RR:
Reply 16, posted (4 years 2 days 12 hours ago) and read 448 times:

So NW doesn't regulary fly a DC-10 from SFO-NRT? What plane does NW serve this route with?

AA777jr

User currently offlineGigneil From United States, joined Nov 2002, 13447 posts, RR: 81
Reply 17, posted (4 years 2 days 12 hours ago) and read 438 times:

Dude, read the thread.

N

User currently offlineDtwintlflyer From United States, joined Jul 2003, 301 posts, RR: 1
Reply 18, posted (4 years 2 days 11 hours ago) and read 412 times:

The 10 may have found its way back into NRT service from SFO because of the delays/canx from the Typhoon that hit Japan only a few days ago. With misconnections and a/c stranded in outbound Asia cities, it is now easy to at least inject a DC10 back across the pond to help move stranded pax.
And hopefully the overzealous stories of the "brake fire" can be put to rest. Heavy a/c and so what, the brakes got a little hot. All was well.

User currently offlineCactus739 From United States, joined Jan 2004, 2213 posts, RR: 30
Reply 19, posted (4 years 2 days 6 hours ago) and read 298 times:

Anyone know why NWA didn't order a fuel dump system on the 330-200? How about the -300?

Gigneil - LOL!.


You can't fix stupid.... - Ron White
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
NW DC-10's Back At LAX posted Tue Nov 15 2005 00:34:45 by Nwcoflyer
KLM MD-11 At SFO This Morning posted Sun Oct 22 2006 05:04:18 by Goomba
19R Departure At SFO This Morning posted Tue Mar 16 2004 19:10:29 by Roots
USAF's New 73G At SFO This Morning posted Wed Apr 16 2003 19:45:43 by AS739X
NW DC-9-10 Currently At MSY posted Wed Jan 29 2003 18:39:48 by Tom in NO
NW DC-10 Emergency At Ksea posted Sun Sep 15 2002 00:03:13 by We're Nuts
NW DC-9-10 Series At MSY posted Fri Dec 21 2001 20:57:26 by Tom in NO
White Tail DC-10 At SEA This Morning posted Mon Aug 26 2002 01:02:45 by Clickhappy
NW DC-10 At LAX posted Tue Jan 17 2006 05:23:55 by Fvyfireman
NW DC-10 At IND 10-8-05! posted Tue Oct 11 2005 01:45:24 by FlyPeoria